Q: Is truth most often used to mean being in accord with fact or reality? ¶
A: Yes, and or fidelity to an original or standard.
Q: Is truth defined as "unchangeable", "that which has no distortion", "that which is beyond distinctions of time, space, and person", "that which pervades the universe in all its constancy"? ¶
A: Yes, The human body, therefore is not completely true as it changes with time, for example.
Q: Is truth constructed by social processes? ¶
A: Yes, and is historically and culturally specific, and that it is in part shaped through the power struggles within a community.
Q: Is truth something that is continually occurring? ¶
A: Yes, and a human being cannot find truth separate from the subjective experience of one's own existing, defined by the values and fundamental essence that consist of one's way of life.
Q: Is truth described partly in "Man from Himself: An Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics"? ¶
A: Yes, and from which excerpts are included below.
Q: Is truth a matter of accurately copying what is known as "objective reality" and then representing it in thoughts? ¶
A: Yes, and words and other symbols.
Q: Is truth its own self-movement within itself? ¶
Q: Is truth discussed and debated in several contexts? ¶
A: Yes, and including philosophy, art, and religion.
Q: Was truth better than truth if it had this life enhancement as a consequence? ¶
Q: Is truth defined for The barn is big? ¶
A: Yes, then for "The barn is big is true"; then for "'The barn is big is true' is true", and so on.
Q: Are truths half-truths? ¶
Q: Is truth what human inquiry would find out on a matter? ¶
A: Yes, and if our practice of inquiry were taken as far as it could profitably go: "The opinion which is fated to be ultimately agreed to by all who investigate, is what we mean by the truth".
Q: Is truth superior to silence? ¶
A: Yes, and etc.
Q: Is truth a resolution of past oppositions into increasingly more accurate approximations of absolute truth? ¶
Q: Is truth covered by a golden bowl? ¶
Q: Is truth verified and confirmed by the results of putting one's concepts into practice? ¶
Q: Is truth analogous to the mechanics of a material body in motion under the influence of its own inner force? ¶
Q: Is truth obtained? ¶
Q: Is truth seen by some as consistent with correspondence theory? ¶
Q: Is truth viewed as the correspondence of language or thought to an independent reality? ¶
A: Yes, and in what is sometimes called the correspondence theory of truth.
Q: Is truth whatever is agreed upon? ¶
A: Yes, and or in some versions, might come to be agreed upon, by some specified group.
Q: Is truth introduced around the turn of the 20th century by Charles Sanders Peirce? ¶
A: Yes, and William James, and John Dewey.
Q: Are truths concerned with the facts of a person's being? ¶
A: Yes, and while subjective truths are concerned with a person's way of being.
Q: Is truth primarily a property of whole systems of propositions? ¶
A: Yes, and can be ascribed to individual propositions only according to their coherence with the whole.
Q: Is truth subjective or objective? ¶
A: Yes, and relative or absolute.
Q: Is truth falsehood? ¶
A: Yes, and which, correspondingly, can also take on a logical, factual, or ethical meaning.
Q: Are truths final and static? ¶
A: Yes, and subjective truths are continuing and dynamic.
Q: Is truth understood to reside in persons""? ¶
A: Yes, and in Ricardian England it "transforms".
Q: Is truth what would be agreed upon in an ideal speech situation? ¶
Q: Is truth viewed as contingent on convention? ¶
A: Yes, and human perception, and social experience.
Q: Is truth not a property? ¶
A: Yes, and but rather can be understood to say that, for instance, the assertion "P" may well involve a substantial truth, and the theorists in this case are minimizing only the redundancy or prosentence involved in the statement such as "that's true".
Q: Is truth a redundant concept? ¶
A: Yes, that is, it is merely a word that is traditionally used in conversation or writing, generally for emphasis, but not a word that actually equates to anything in reality.
Q: Is truth merely nominal and? ¶
A: Yes, and therefore, we cannot employ it to establish which judgements are true.
Q: Is truth that concordance of an abstract statement with the ideal limit towards which endless investigation would tend to bring scientific belief? ¶
A: Yes, and which concordance the abstract statement may possess by virtue of the confession of its inaccuracy and one-sidedness, and this confession is an essential ingredient of truth.
Q: Are truths deceptive and may lead to a false conclusion? ¶
Q: Is truth the reference of a judgment to something different from itself which is its sufficient reason? ¶
A: Yes, Judgments can have material, formal, transcendental, or metalogical truth.
Q: Is truth called logical or formal? ¶