Q: Is safety the state of being "safe"? ¶
A: Yes, and the condition of being protected from harm or other non-desirable outcomes.
Q: Is safety relative? ¶
Q: Is safety sues have been discovered one by one? ¶
A: Yes, and over more than a century in the case mentioned, in the work of many thousands of practitioners, and cannot be deduced by a single individual over a few decades.
Q: Is safety often seen as one of a group of related disciplines: quality? ¶
A: Yes, and reliability, availability, maintainability and safety.
Q: Is safety sues is insurance? ¶
A: Yes, and which compensates for or provides restitution in the case of damage or loss.
Q: Is safety sues can be readily deduced? ¶
Q: Is safety achieved when a product or design meets applicable standards and practices for design and construction or manufacture? ¶
A: Yes, and regardless of the product's actual safety history.
Q: Is safety sues and propose standards? ¶
Q: Is safety a normative concept? ¶
Q: Is safety the condition of a “steady state” of an organization or place doing what it is supposed to do? ¶
Q: Is safety generally interpreted as implying a real and significant impact on risk of death? ¶
A: Yes, and injury or damage to property.