Q: Is property that which belongs to or with something? ¶
A: Yes, and whether as an attribute or as a component of said thing.
Q: Is property quite conservative? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is property suspect? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Was property basic to his philosophy? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is property very concrete as a physical thing-in-itself? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is property such that an article of property is? ¶
A: Yes, and by law or otherwise by traditional conceptualization, subject to expiration even when inheritable, which is a key distinction from tangible property.
Q: Is property often defined as a relationship between two or more individuals and an object? ¶
A: Yes, and in which at least one of these individuals holds a bundle of rights over the object.
Q: Is property interest in movable property? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is property necessary? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is property theft!" In natural resources"? ¶
A: Yes, and he sees two types of property, de jure property and de facto property , and argues that the former is illegitimate.
Q: Is property legitimate when it emerges in such a way as not to harm anyone? ¶
A: Yes, and thirdly, that historically some, but by no means all, property which has evolved has done so legitimately, with the implication that the present distribution of property is a complex mixture of legitimately and illegitimately held titles.
Q: Is property closely linked? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is property one or more components , whether physical or incorporeal, of a person's estate? ¶
A: Yes, or so belonging to, as in being owned by, a person or jointly a group of people or a legal entity like a corporation or even a society.
Q: Is property common? ¶
A: Yes, and there are natural problems that arise due to differences in labor: "If they do not share equally enjoyments and toils, those who labor much and get little will necessarily complain of those who labor little and receive or consume much".
Q: Is property "idyllic" fairy tales that hide a violent historical process? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is property essential to a non-coercive social structure? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is property defined by the code of the local sovereignty? ¶
A: Yes, and protected wholly or more usually partially by such entity, the owner being responsible for any remainder of protection.