Perfection FAQs:


Q: Is perfection used to designate a range of diverse?

A: Yes, and if often kindred, concepts.

Q: Is perfection perfect in technology?

A: Yes, and in the sense that irregularity is useful.

Q: Was perfection expected to come about by a variety of means?

A: Yes.

Q: Was perfection a matter of grace, also fell by the wayside?

A: Yes, man himself must strive for it, and if a single man could not accomplish it, then perhaps mankind could.

Q: Is perfection no more attainable for us than is infinity?

A: Yes.

Q: Was perfection already in decline?

A: Yes.

Q: Is perfection to be found only in heaven?

A: Yes.

Q: Is perfection the desire of it?

A: Yes.

Q: Is perfection an awareness of God's perfection and of one's own imperfection?

A: Yes.

Q: Is perfection a result of development?

A: Yes.

Q: Was perfection developed by the school's chief aesthetician?

A: Yes, and Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten.

Q: Is perfection constancy of striving and effort?

A: Yes.

Q: Was perfection not a theological concept?

A: Yes, and but an ontological one, because it was a feature, in some degree, of every being.

Q: Was perfection attainable for man?

A: Yes.

Q: Is perfection not an attribute of God""?

A: Yes, and to "Perfection is an attribute of God".

Q: Was perfection harder to apply to Renaissance literature but became so common — often?

A: Yes, and linked to "eccelente" — as to become banal.

Q: Was perfection a fundamental article of faith for the Enlightenment?

A: Yes.

Q: Is perfection imperfection?

A: Yes.

Q: Was perfection a more comprehensible idea than beauty?

A: Yes.

Q: Was perfection a single quality, the Pythagoreans, Plato and their adherents held that beauty also was a single quality?

A: Yes, hence, for every kind of art, there was but one perfect and proper form.

Q: Was perfection not very remote from modern self-perfection?

A: Yes.

Q: Is perfection perfect—applies not only to human affairs?

A: Yes, and but to technology.

Q: Was perfection the cause of beauty?

A: Yes.

Q: Is perfection that which it is better to have than not to have?

A: Yes.

Q: Was perfection to be found in the right proportions and in a harmonious arrangement of parts?

A: Yes.

Q: Was perfection a principal concept in aesthetics?

A: Yes.

Q: Is perfection binding on man?

A: Yes, and whereas personal perfection is only becoming to him.

Q: Is perfection in the Gospels as well as elsewhere in the Bible?

A: Yes.