Q: Is perfection used to designate a range of diverse? ¶
A: Yes, and if often kindred, concepts.
Q: Is perfection perfect in technology? ¶
A: Yes, and in the sense that irregularity is useful.
Q: Was perfection expected to come about by a variety of means? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Was perfection a matter of grace, also fell by the wayside? ¶
A: Yes, man himself must strive for it, and if a single man could not accomplish it, then perhaps mankind could.
Q: Is perfection no more attainable for us than is infinity? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Was perfection already in decline? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is perfection to be found only in heaven? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is perfection the desire of it? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is perfection an awareness of God's perfection and of one's own imperfection? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is perfection a result of development? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Was perfection developed by the school's chief aesthetician? ¶
A: Yes, and Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten.
Q: Is perfection constancy of striving and effort? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Was perfection not a theological concept? ¶
A: Yes, and but an ontological one, because it was a feature, in some degree, of every being.
Q: Was perfection attainable for man? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is perfection not an attribute of God""? ¶
A: Yes, and to "Perfection is an attribute of God".
Q: Was perfection harder to apply to Renaissance literature but became so common — often? ¶
A: Yes, and linked to "eccelente" — as to become banal.
Q: Was perfection a fundamental article of faith for the Enlightenment? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is perfection imperfection? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Was perfection a more comprehensible idea than beauty? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Was perfection a single quality, the Pythagoreans, Plato and their adherents held that beauty also was a single quality? ¶
A: Yes, hence, for every kind of art, there was but one perfect and proper form.
Q: Was perfection not very remote from modern self-perfection? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is perfection perfect—applies not only to human affairs? ¶
A: Yes, and but to technology.
Q: Was perfection the cause of beauty? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is perfection that which it is better to have than not to have? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Was perfection to be found in the right proportions and in a harmonious arrangement of parts? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Was perfection a principal concept in aesthetics? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is perfection binding on man? ¶
A: Yes, and whereas personal perfection is only becoming to him.
Q: Is perfection in the Gospels as well as elsewhere in the Bible? ¶
A: Yes.