Q: Are humour and what social function it serves? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are humour in fact a major factor in achieving? ¶
A: Yes, and sustaining, higher psychological wellbeing.
Q: Are humour a ubiquitous? ¶
A: Yes, and highly ingrained, and largely meaningful aspect of human experience and is therefore decidedly relevant in organisational contexts, such as the workplace.
Q: Are humour thought to include a combination of ridiculousness and wit in an individual? ¶
A: Yes, the paradigmatic case being Shakespeare's Sir John Falstaff.
Q: Are humour limited to positive emotions and things which cause positive affect? ¶
A: Yes, and it must be delimited from laughter and their relationship should be further defined.
Q: Are humour a crucial characteristic looked for in a romantic partner? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are humour often used to ease tension? ¶
A: Yes, and it might make sense that the same would be true for anxiety.
Q: Are humour still two different words? ¶
A: Yes, and the former referring to a person's mood or to the archaic concept of the four humours.
Q: Are humour in fact a cause for healthier psychological wellbeing? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are humour used to improve the cognitive capabilities of the students? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are humour shown reduce stress and facilitate socialisation and serves as a social bonding function? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are humour of negative characteristics? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are humour deemed positive? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are humour immediately effective in helping to deal with distress? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are humour often used to make light of difficult or stressful situations and to brighten up a social atmosphere in general? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are humour an underlying character trait associated with the positive emotions used in the broaden-and-build theory of cognitive development? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are humour used by people who do not consider the consequences of their jokes? ¶
A: Yes, and mainly focus on the entertainment of the listeners.