Q: Is discrimination treatment or consideration of? ¶
A: Yes, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person based on the group, class, or category to which the person is perceived to belong rather than on individual attributes.
Q: Is discrimination banking? ¶
A: Yes, for example if one is refused credit or is offered unequal loan terms based on one’s gender.
Q: Is discrimination just another "taste"? ¶
A: Yes, and then the markets were not to punish for it.
Q: Is discrimination discrimination based on the region in which a person lives or was born? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is discrimination suggested to be labeled linguicism or logocism? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is discrimination the unequal treatment people experience because of the drugs they use? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is discrimination efficient? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is discrimination discrimination and stereotyping based on the grounds of someone's age? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is discrimination fairly easy to spot – ‘Barmaid wanted’, but indirect sex discrimination, where an unnecessary requirement puts one sex at a disproportionate disadvantage compared to the opposite sex, is sometimes less easy to spot, although some are obvious – ‘Bar person wanted – must look good in a mini skirt’? ¶
A: Yes, Another setting where there is usually gender discrimination is when one is refused to extend their credit, refused approval of credit/loan process, and if there is a burden of unequal loan terms based on one’s gender.
Q: Is discrimination heterogeneous by the activity older candidates undertook during their additional post-educational years? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is discrimination generally looked down upon? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is discrimination valuing or treating a person or group differently because of what they do or do not believe or because of their feelings towards a given religion? ¶
A: Yes.