Q: Is disadvantage not unique to the plan? ¶
A: Yes, and therefore not relevant.
Q: Are disadvantages "real world" and provide education on how bills are passed and politics in general? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are disadvantages frowned upon because they link to virtually every affirmative plan? ¶
A: Yes, and destroying the on case debate and focusing solely on the disadvantage.
Q: Is disadvantage an impact turn? ¶
A: Yes, and in which the affirmative team reads evidence stating that the disadvantages impact would actually be good or that the status quo creates a worse impact.
Q: Are disadvantages abusive to the affirmative team has much popularity? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disadvantage to "straight turn it"? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disadvantage a special type of linear disadvantage which claims that the affirmative will aggravate the problem in the status quo to the extent that it passes a brink? ¶
A: Yes, and at which time the impact happens all at once.
Q: Is disadvantage unique in the way that it links to affirmative plan? ¶
A: Yes, Rather than linking to the specific plan action, it links to the fact that a plan passes at all.