Q: Is disability an impairment that may be cognitive? ¶
A: Yes, and developmental, intellectual, mental, physical, sensory, or some combination of these.
Q: Is disability the idea that disability is constructed as the social response to a deviance from the norm? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disability rooted in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century developments? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are disabilities minimal? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disability an impairment? ¶
A: Yes, and restriction, or limitation is wrong.
Q: Is disability not defined by the physical features of the body but by a deviance from the social convention of health? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disability not an attribute of an individual? ¶
A: Yes, but rather a complex collection of conditions, created by the social environment.
Q: Is disability one of the main focuses of this idea? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disability interpreted as an issue of discrimination? ¶
A: Yes, and thereby paving the way for rights groups to achieve equality through legal means.
Q: Is disability a human rights concern? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disability more common in developing than in developed nations? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are disabilities an umbrella term? ¶
A: Yes, and covering impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions.
Q: Is disability heavily criticized for being dehumanizing and failing to place importance on the perspectives of persons with disabilities? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disability aimed at a "cure"? ¶
A: Yes, or the individual’s adjustment and behavioral change that would lead to an "almost-cure" or effective cure.
Q: Is disability thus not just a health problem? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disability often defined according to thresholds set on a continuum of disability? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disability identified? ¶
A: Yes, but is not modifying the person.
Q: Are disabilities adversely affected is through the internalization of the oppression they experience? ¶
A: Yes, and which can lead to feeling that they are weak, crazy, worthless, or any number of other negative attributes that may be associated with their conditions.
Q: Is disability central to the social model? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disability the idea that disability is constructed by social expectations and institutions rather than biological differences? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disability asylums? ¶
A: Yes, and clinics, and, prisons.
Q: Are disabilities greatly affected by disasters? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Was disability often viewed as a by-product of incest between first-degree relatives or second-degree relatives? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disability a contested concept? ¶
A: Yes, and with different meanings for different communities.
Q: Are disabilities very large? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Was disability in majority compared to discrimination due to gender? ¶
A: Yes, and ethnicity or age.
Q: Is disability based upon the “rights-based" model and claims that people with disabilities should have equal rights and access to products"? ¶
A: Yes, and goods and services offered by businesses.
Q: Is disability just a difference in the individual from what is considered "normal" in society? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are disabilities a threat to public interests and well-being? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are disabilities scarce? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are disabilities problematic? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are disabilities documented by a healthcare provider in order to assess qualifications for disability benefits? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are disabilities gendered? ¶
A: Yes, and the interactions of these two identities lead to different experiences.
Q: Is disability both cultural and ideological in creation? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Are disabilities unable to complete tasks that are commonly required in the workforce? ¶
A: Yes.
Q: Is disability minority rights and consumerist model of disability that recognizing people with disabilities and their stakeholders as representing a large group of consumers? ¶
A: Yes, and employees and voters.
Q: Are disabilities not visible some abusers cannot rationalize the non-physical disability with a need for understanding? ¶
A: Yes, and support, and so on.
Q: Is disability sues and can be seen as an offshoot of the medical model? ¶
A: Yes.